...quite magnificently, by Robert Bork.
« Uh Oh! | Main | Kiss me, Hardy »
October 19, 2005
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83457498f69e200d8345cade553ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The President rebuked...:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
May 2009
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Mr Seat on I got it from Agnes
- dearieme on I got it from Agnes
- Mr Seat on Back in our Seat
- Cleanthes on Back in our Seat
- dearieme on Ah, the joy of the market
- The Pedant-General on Ah, the joy of the market
- dearieme on Iran and Syria - the endgame?
- Kathy K on India - dark days (2)
- DirtCrashr on India - dark days (2)
- DirtCrashr on India - dark days (2)
Well said, Borky old bean! I would only add that were I American, I would reject the assumption that one need be a lawyer at all to sit on the Supreme Court. I can see that they want a reflective, intelligent, educated judge, but the Constitution was written to be read by laymen, and suitable laymen are likely to do a much better job than unsuitable lawyers. Keep lawyers for the technical level of judging: the Constitutional court would be better for having a mix of people on it.
Posted by: dearieme | October 21, 2005 at 12:16 AM